dogs and humans?

Recently the big commotion over this issue. And more and more people come up to take either sides.

From some China netizens:“Singapore is a small Chinese state enjoying the dignity given to them by big China. It is correct to say that there are more dogs than humans in Singapore. It’s easy to change a country, but not ‘dog’s nature.’”

So superficial the words. Whats makes you think that "big" = to the one in better position to give? There are countries big but "empty" and empty vessels make the most noise. And indeed they really make the most noise. super good at quarrelling. A skill that we singaporean can never win. But dignity wise.........when you see how corrupted a country is from the past history and the history so long.....can see so much. And is the country really so powerful and respectful until we look up on her?

something like the dignity= earn more money theory. Now become dignity= given by people "bigger" than us.

if "bigger" = "better" or more superior, then people with big breasts should also produce more breast milk for babies, isn't it? then how come its not the case. So productivity has nothing to do with "big" or "small". Not a matter of size. And a country ability in giving has nothing to do with size too. countries can be small, but they earned the respect of others who are bigger in size than them. And many times we see countries that are small but more developed and culture and providing aids to "big" countries when crisis arises. dignity is not given by others. You live your life in dignity, dignity is from yourself. You choose to live in dignity, and you can choose not to.